Autism’s Crime
The news is full of stories of rampant fraud surrounding autism treatment programs. A former AUSA, has covered it on X, noting that prosecutions have been ongoing for some time. But are there larger lessons to be learned?
Well, one question that ought to be asked is whether there is an autism epidemic. It’s funny how the media operates these days. With President Trump in the White House, Scientific American published an article back in April of last year that lays out many good reasons to question the numbers, given that Secretary Kennedy made autism a priority. It notes, correctly, that the diagnostic criteria have broadened considerably over the years. These changes also included allowing simultaneous diagnoses of ADHD with autism, which was previously disallowed. It also reports on a study that observes a decline in the diagnosis of intellectual disability while the rates of autism soared. But then there’s this:
Another piece of evidence for changes in diagnosis explaining a large difference in the prevalence of autism is that autism rates vary widely from state to state in the U.S. The state with the highest prevalence of autism is California, with a rate of 53.1 per 1,000 eight-year-olds, while the one with the lowest prevalence is Texas, with a rate of 9.7 per 1,000 eight-year-olds. That’s a huge difference. But according to the CDC’s own report, it’s likely linked to California’s intense push for early screening and assessment.
The upshot: When the government puts money on the table, we get more of it.
